B2B buyers can see right through them. They’re more discerning than ever in their research. And they know when messaging can’t be trusted or even bothered with.
But they still need to weigh their options. It’s a standard part of the buying process.
So, it’s not that comparison pages are useless. We just need to make them better.
In this article, we’ll show you a philosophy to create comparison pages that serve your ideal buyers and improve your conversion rates.
The problem with traditional comparison pages
The root cause of overly biased comparison pages is usually one of two things:
- It’s too much about you
- It’s too focused on discounting competitors
Bias as a default angle has led to a standard way of creating pages:
- Feature dumps with no context or differentiation
- Direct attacks on competitors (e.g., “Competitor X is too slow”)
- Empty claims that aren’t backed by evidence (e.g., “The No.1 alternative to X”)
- Comparison tables that only highlight what you’re good at
None of this helps potential buyers. Your content doesn’t meet user intent.
People visit your page with a clear pain point: to understand the actual differences between your product and its competitors.
Focusing too much on yourself doesn’t solve their problem.
Relentlessly putting down a competitor gives the impression you’re overcompensating for something.
If you have to discount a competitor to make your product sound good, do you truly believe in it? And why should customers?
In both instances, you risk coming across as insecure or untrustworthy. This can harm your product’s credibility and your brand’s reputation.
If being too self-centered or disparaging is the problem, the solution is simple: be more honest and objective.
Here’s how to sell your product as the best solution while acknowledging what your competitors bring to the table.
Focus on positioning before features
Your product has features that deliver value unmatched by any other solution—a business model, process, or intellectual property that only you offer. They’re your reason for existing in the first place.
Rather than comparing everything you do against everything your competitor does, put your unique strengths front and center.
For example, ActiveCampaign’s biggest strength is its customer experience automation. Its tools let users go deeper with automation, improving the customer journey at every touchpoint.
It’s an advantage ActiveCampaign has over competitors like Mailchimp. So, its comparison page leads with it:

The brand is not overly boastful about automation. The tone feels factual, like a neutral third party could have written it. Instead, it uses positioning to demonstrate value.
ActiveCampaign continues to position Mailchimp as a “simple” tool for anyone new to automation:

It then positions itself as the best choice for advanced automation:

When you’re clear on the unique value of your product over another, you don’t need to turn to hyperbole or trashing the competition. You only have to communicate what makes you the better choice.
Before creating comparison content, identify what sets you apart from each specific competitor. These are the core differentiators around which to build all comparison content.
April Dunford’s product positioning exercise can help with this.

Here’s an overview of how it works:
- Step 1. Get clear on where you are right now, the value you deliver today, and the best way to center that in your positioning.
- Step 2. List everything that makes you unique.
- Step 3. Capture how your unique attributes help customers overcome their pain points.
- Step 4. Figure out who really cares about your value. These are the people you’ll aim to appeal to in your messaging.
- Step 5. Choose a market frame of reference that makes your value obvious to your best prospects.
Crafting messaging around your unique attributes will help you talk about features in the context of differentiators. You’ll give buyers the kind of useful information they’re looking for, but you’ll do it with integrity.
Reframe the comparison table for balance
A comparison table is an integral part of any comparison page. It’s the most visually effective way to show what you offer over a competitor.
It’s also easy to get wrong. We’ve all seen comparison tables that look like this:

Green ✅in the left column, red ❌in the right column. One product does everything, the other does nothing.
Guess what? No one’s buying it.
By cherry-picking which features make you look good, you risk:
- Including features that buyers don’t care (or know) about
- Conveniently ignoring features a competitor has that you lack
Both condescend to the reader. It also removes nuance, which can backfire if you’re not careful, causing a prospect to question your credentials.
For example, if you put a red ❌against a feature a competitor offers differently or with limitations—and the buyer knows this—expect to lose credibility.
A better solution? Stick to what matters to your audience.
Focus on 6–8 core features, framed around buyer needs and pain points.
There’s another benefit to this: user experience.
Eyetracking research by NN Group shows people frequently re-read column headings. A list that’s so long readers have to scroll to see the headings disrupts their experience. When that happens, you’ll frustrate them, making them more likely to abandon your website.
Chances are, your competitors offer similar features. What makes you truly different? Use your strengths to position your product as the better option.
You can do this while staying objective. Take a look at how app-building platform Nocoly compares its product to rival Outsystems:

Rather than use checkmarks, Nocoly sticks to the facts. It lays out what both products offer, positioning itself as a neutral advisor.
The neutral voice is refreshing. It helps Nocoly build trust by appearing objective and stops prospects from feeling forced to judge the competition.
Nocoly’s differentiation on features like data, languages, and price makes it more appealing to prospects without discounting the competition.
However, if an enterprise-level developer views the table, Outsystems might look like the more appealing option.
Will this mean losing potential buyers?
Look at it this way instead: a good comparison table should attract your best-fit buyers and filter out the rest.
You’ll only lose people who weren’t ideal prospects in the first place.
Give competitors credit where it’s due
There are some things your competitors will do better than you. You know it. Buyers know it.
Being honest about it will set your page apart from most other competitor pages. It’ll also build trust with buyers who’ll view most of those pages.
For example, rather than ignore or diminish Gong’s standing as the pioneer of Revenue Intelligence, Claap kicks off its comparison page by paying homage:

This immediately disarms skepticism. Claap isn’t trying to be brash. It’s simply showing why its product is a viable alternative to another great product.
Vidyard does a similar thing, acknowledging Loom as a powerful video communication tool from the start:

ActiveCampaign goes a step further, praising Mailchimp for better ease of use:

It makes a refreshing change from comparison pages that “talk themselves up” while dumping on rivals. Better still, it’s objective, making the page more trustworthy.
It comes back to positioning. Which is why it’s so important to get clear on your value first.
When you know your strengths, giving credit where it’s due doesn’t take away from your product. It’s a power play.
It shows you’re confident that your product is the best option for prospects, regardless of the competition.
Consider competitive alternatives
A common mistake startups make is defining a competitor as a solution that looks like yours. For example, if you’ve built a project management tool, you might view other software solving the same problem as your rivals.
In reality, you’re up against all kinds of solutions. April Dunford calls the biggest of these “status quo” solutions — the tools people were using to solve their problems before you showed up. They’re usually free (or cheap) and easy to use.
For instance, a business might manage projects in a spreadsheet or over email.
If you want to win business, address the status quo in your comparison content, particularly your middle-of-the-funnel (MOFU) “alternative” articles.
ClickUp does this in a guide comparing project management software (its core offer) against Excel.
The guide acknowledges the benefits of Excel as a status quo product:

Then subtly positions ClickUp as the better solution by comparing the two products:

While competitors focus on each other, ClickUp jumps the queue, gaining the trust of prospects before they consider other project management software.
To identify your competitive alternatives, ask yourself: “How are target customers solving their problem today?”
You’ll often find the answer in your market research and sales conversations. The solutions that keep cropping up are the ones to target in your comparison content.
Something to keep in mind when digging: not every product is a competitor.
As April notes:
“I see startups making the mistake of considering every solution on the market that could possibly be competitive as an ‘alternative.’ The reality is that many of these solutions simply aren’t on the radar of your customers. That could be because the company targets a very different type of customer. It could be because the company is very small and is simply not known in the market outside of their specific niche.”
“Whatever the reason, these ‘phantom competitors’ should not be considered when working on your positioning. You’re watering down your positioning by trying to position against them.”
Help buyers select the right solution for them
The goal of your comparison pages is to make prospects feel like they’re making an informed choice.
The best way to do this? Be helpful.
Let’s go back to ActiveCampaign’s Mailchimp comparison page. Here’s the first paragraph:

Naturally, the page positions ActiveCampaign as the best solution. But it’s also truly informative. Prospects get a good look at both products on the features they care about.
Vidyard does a similar thing on its comparison page. Rather than answer: “Which one is better for your business?” with a blatant sales pitch, it stays objective:

It informs readers and empowers them to make the right decision by being helpful, not desperate.
Here’s another example from XTM’s website localization tool comparison article.
A comparison table makes it clear that XTM is best for large teams and enterprises with complex needs. While other tools are better suited to small businesses:

It’s a helpful guide with relevant information. XTM’s ideal customer is naturally drawn to its product, while everyone else is pointed in a different direction.
Here’s what you need to do: focus less on being your competition and more on showing who your product is for.
Trust your positioning. If you’re clear on your value and ideal buyers, you’ll have an easier time presenting competitors fairly and demonstrating superiority in a neutral tone.
Let customers do the talking
There’s no better trust builder than social proof. But reviews are standard practice.
To tip the scales in your favor, get strategic. Use testimonials from customers who have switched to your brand.
FreshBooks does this well on its QuickBooks comparison page:

Highlighting real experiences of users who switched from QuickBooks builds more trust than a generic five-star review. Their results speak louder.
Track which products customers switched from during your onboarding. Follow up with interviews a few weeks later to get powerful testimonials.
Make sure you focus on how using your product has solved a problem they were experiencing with their previous solution. That’s what’s most relevant to potential buyers.
Alternatively, follow FreshBooks’ lead and pull reviews from a third-party platform like G2.
If you want a more radically transparent approach, let your customers shape the content of your comparison page. This is something Nocoly is testing on its website.
Founder Phil Ren explains how opening a section of its pages for notes and comments improves the buyer experience:
“This section features comments from customers who switched from the competitor. These stories highlight how they compared the two products and made their decision. We regularly update this section with real, selective insights from customers. While the content is curated, it reflects genuine customer experiences and offers valuable context for potential buyers facing similar decisions.”
The more genuine customer experiences you can add, the more objective and influential your page will be.
Comparison pages are positioning tools
A comparison page is an extension of your product positioning. Everything starts from your unique attributes. Nailing them lets you present a strong argument to your best-fit customers.
But remember: these customers are also researching other options. Keep your content helpful and fair. Back up claims with genuine testimonials. Do this repeatedly and you’ll grow trust, credibility, and—crucially—conversions.